A Strange Medrash That Proves Eliyahu is Pinchos The Medrash Plia says that if you want to prove that Pinchos is Eliyahu, you see it from the Pasuk in Devarim (1:1), “Eileh HaDvarim Asher Diber Moshe.” What does this mean?
The Maharsham explains that the Ran says in his Drashos, “The reason why we mix the foul smelling Chelbana into the beautiful smelling Kitores is because everything is strengthened by its polar opposite. The Chelbana brings out a more powerful smell from the other spices.”
Similarly, Moshe Rav Kellin was a Kvad Peh, he had a speech impediment. This speech impediment brought out the greatest speech ever in the Aseres HaDibros and in his conveying the Torah to Bnei Yisrael in Arvos Mo’av in Sefer Devarim. Eliyahu brings peace to the world. We see from Moshe’s speech in Devarim that Pinchos who murdered Zimri must be Eilyahu, and that violent act was the catalyst that made him the great peacemaker Eliyahu.
****************************

Why Did Pinchos Have To Wait To Become A Kohen? Pinchos was rewarded, and became a Kohen, after he courageously defended Hashem’s honor by killing Zimri. Although his father was Elazar, and his grandfather Aharon HaKohen, he, himself, was not a Kohen since Hashem only bestowed the Kehuna on Aharon, his children, and the grandchildren born thereafter; whereas Pinchos had already been born. The Maharal MiPrague asks, “Why did Hashem do this strange thing and rob him of the stature that he rightfully deserved from the beginning?”
Rav Schorr answers that the reason why Pinchos earned the Kehuna was that this killing was considered an act of chessed. Any act done L’Shem Mitzva will have the opposite of the detrimental effect that would logically follow (e.g., getting rich from giving tzedaka). Although murder is the ultimate cruel act, when done in a manner that would be a mitzva, it is the ultimate chessed.
However, the halacha remains that a Kohen who murders may not perform Birchas Kohanim. By not giving Pinchos the status of a Kohen, he earned it with the killing of Zimri. Had Pinchos already been a Kohen, that very same act would have made him forfeit his right to serve as a Kohen.
*****************************

One Leader At a Time, Please Moshe Rav Kellin asks Hashem to find Bnei Yisrael a leader so that, “V’Lo Sihiyeh Adas Yisroel KaTzon Asher Ein Lahem Ro’eh”; Bnei Yisroel should not be like sheep without a shepherd,” 27:17. Rav Elchonon asks, “What was Moshe so worried about? There was Yehoshua, Elazar, Pinchos, and the Zekeinim?”
Rav Elchonon answers that many leaders, do not replace the need for one leader. Although normally Chazal say “Within two is included one,” (B’chlal Masayim, Maneh) in this case it is not true. Even if there are many great tzadikim, you need one decisive voice to lead the people. Moshe knew there were many good people around. He asked Hashem to please choose from among the candidates an, “Ish Al HaEidah; A single person to lead the people, alone.”
***************************

What It Takes To Be a Kana’I Pinchos got up and decided on his own to defend the honor of Hashem and kill Zimri. He acted in accordance with the halacha of “Kana’im Pog’im Bo”. Had he asked Bais Din for permission, he would not have been told to kill him. A Kana’i cannot get permission from Bais Din. He must act on his own. This halacha is quite unique and contrary to the general Torah Hashkafa. Why is this so?
Rav Moshe Feinstein says in Darash Moshe that while it is important to do mitzvos with pure intentions, nevertheless, a mitzva done with ulterior motives and for the sake of personal benefits, is still worth doing. However, when it comes to punishing others, this can only be done if carried out with 100% pure intentions and totally L’Shem Shamayim. Judging a person’s intentions are not within the abilities of another human. Only Hashem can know a person’s thoughts. Therefore, in the case of Kana’im Pogim Bo, Bais Din can never render an opinion if a particular person can carry out “Nikmas Hashem”. This is between the person and Hashem alone. This was the gripe of the Shevatim against Pinchos. They doubted his sincerity until Hashem testified on Pinchos’s behalf, and awarded him the Kehuna AND of Sholom.
***************************

Taking A Cue From Bnos Tzelafchad Immediately after the Torah talks about the Yerusha of Bnos Tzelafchad, the next parsha tells how Moshe asked Hashem to appoint his successor. Rashi says that after Hashem told Moshe to give a Nachala to Bnos Tzelafchad, he asked Hashem to let his own children inherit his leadership. However, the chiddush of Bnos Tzelafchad was that daughters inherit. That sons inherit, was known long before that, so why did Moshe wait until now?
The Mekach Tov brings from Rav Mordechai of Chernobyl that Moshe, being the most modest man on earth, considered himself a Chotei. That being the case, he didn’t believe he would merit to pass along his inheritance to his children. When Hashem declared that Bnos Tzelafchad should receive their father’s inheritance even though by their own admission he was a sinner, he then felt he could beseech Hashem on behalf of his own children.
****************************

Pinchos Closes The Chapter On Nadav & Avihu The Chiddushei HaRim says that the brave act of Pinchos was Michaper on the aveira of Nadav and Avihu and brought the Chanukas HaMishkan to completion. The aveira of Nadav and Avihu was that they did something that they were not commanded to do. Pinchos, on the other hand, did something that must be done, but no one may pasken that you must do (Halacha V’Ein Morin Kein). Nadav and Avihu took action without consulting Moshe Rav Kellin. Pinchos asked Moshe, although he did not have an answer. Nadav and Avihu were the first korbanos of the Mishkan, as they gave their lives Al Kiddush HaShem. Pinchos was moser nefesh and
risked his life to be Mikadesh Shem Shamayim. “This is why,” says the Chiddushei HaRim, “Parshas Pinchos has in it the parsha of Korbanos Tzibbur.”

Created By Avrohom Sherman
786-565-9945
[email protected]